The analysis of implicit premises within children's argumentative inferences
-
Greco, Sara
ORCID
Istituto di argomentazione, linguistica e semiotica (IALS), Facoltà di comunicazione, cultura e società, Università della Svizzera italiana, Svizzera
-
Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly
Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
-
Iannaccone, Antonio
Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
-
Rocci, Andrea
Istituto di argomentazione, linguistica e semiotica (IALS), Facoltà di comunicazione, cultura e società, Università della Svizzera italiana, Svizzera
-
Convertini, Josephine
University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
-
Schaer, Rebecca
Istituto di argomentazione, linguistica e semiotica (IALS), Facoltà di comunicazione, cultura e società, Università della Svizzera italiana, Svizzera
Show more…
Published in:
- Informal Logic. - 2018, vol. 38, no. 4, p. 438-470
English
This paper presents preliminary findings of the project [name omitted for anonymity]. This interdisciplinary project builds on Argumentation theory and developmental sociocultural psychology for the study of children’s argumentation. We reconstruct children’s inferences in adult-child and child-child dialogical interaction in conversation in different settings. We focus in particular on implicit premises using the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) for the reconstruction of the inferential configuration of arguments. Our findings reveal that sources of misunderstandings are more often than not due to misalignments of implicit premises between adults and children; these misalignments concern material premises rather than the inferential-procedural level.
-
Collections
-
-
Language
-
-
Classification
-
Language, linguistics
-
License
-
-
Open access status
-
gold
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://n2t.net/ark:/12658/srd1336157
Statistics
Document views: 2
File downloads:
-
Greco_2018_InformalLogic_il.v38i4.5029: 2