Back
Masiero_2024_MECOSAN_mesa2024-129oa18722
Journal article

Cost and benefit analysis of Surgenon-performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound (SP-POCUS) supporting decision making in a General Surgery Department

  • Pezzotta, G. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale, dell'Informazione e della Produzione, Università di Bergamo, Italia
  • Masiero, G. ORCID Istituto di economia politica (IdEP), Facoltà di scienze economiche, Università della Svizzera italiana, Svizzera - Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Bergamo, Italia
  • Malagnino, A. Dipartimento di Chirurgia Robotica e d'Urgenza, ASST Lecco, Italia
  • Bozzo, S. Dipartimento di Chirurgia Robotica e d'Urgenza, ASST Lecco, Italia
  • Carrara, G. Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italia
  • Brescacin, A. Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale, GOM Niguarda, Milano, Italia
  • Zago, M. Dipartimento Chirurgia Robotica e d’Urgenza, ASST Lecco, Italia
Show more…
  • 2024
Published in:
  • Mecosan. - 2024, vol. 129, no. Febbraio
SP-POCUS
Bedside US
Routinely use
Surgeon
Cost-benefit analysis
Costs
Benefits
Hospital stay
Hospitalization
Surgery
English Background: There still is reluctance among surgeons when it comes to using bedside US in their daily clinical practice, except for very specific fields. Generally, the decision-making process relies on imaging techniques (e.g. CT, MRI). This may lead to a latency of execution, and consequently to a delay in decision making. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the economic impact of systematic and routine use of surgeon-performed point-of-care US (SP-POCUS) in the everyday activities of a surgical department, both for urgent and elective cases. Methods: We conducted a cost-benefit analysis comparing the incremental costs and savings of diagnostic strategies based on alternative procedures to bedside US. The dataset refers to 478 SP-POCUS performed at the General Surgery Department of Policlinico San Pietro (Bergamo, Italy) between January 2018 and February 2020. The alternatives to SP-POCUS were computed tomography (CT), X-ray (RX), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and US performed by the Radiologist. Per-exam costs, including personnel time expenditure, were calculated. Results: The economic evaluation revealed that the use of SP-POCUS allowed the hospital to generate €355 net savings per patient, mainly from avoided hospitalizations, fewer hospital days and hours of operating room. Extrapolating these results to a wider scenario, in a similar setting they could have represented a potential annual savings of more than €1.1 million for the Regional healthcare system in Lombardy, and more than €5.7 millions for the whole NHS in Italy. Conclusions: We provided evidence that SP-POCUS may generate important costs savings for health care providers, as it represents the most cost-effective initial diagnostic procedure compared to standard alternatives. The wide applicability of SP-POCUS could be obtained at rather negligible costs for investment in staff training.
Collections
Language
  • English
Classification
Economics
License
CC BY-NC-ND
Open access status
gold
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://n2t.net/ark:/12658/srd1334521
Statistics
Document views: 10 File downloads:
  • Masiero_2024_MECOSAN_mesa2024-129oa18722: 6