<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Pezzotta, G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Masiero, G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Malagnino, A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bozzo, S.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Carrara, G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Brescacin, A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Zago, M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Background: There still is reluctance among surgeons when it comes to using bedside US in their daily clinical practice, except for very specific fields. Generally, the decision-making process relies on imaging techniques (e.g. CT, MRI). This may lead to a latency of execution, and consequently to a delay in decision making. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the economic impact of systematic and routine use of surgeon-performed point-of-care US (SP-POCUS) in the everyday activities of a surgical department, both for urgent and elective cases. Methods: We conducted a cost-benefit analysis comparing the incremental costs and savings of diagnostic strategies based on alternative procedures to bedside US. The dataset refers to 478 SP-POCUS performed at the General Surgery Department of Policlinico San Pietro (Bergamo, Italy) between January 2018 and February 2020. The alternatives to SP-POCUS were computed tomography (CT), X-ray (RX), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and US performed by the Radiologist. Per-exam costs, including personnel time expenditure, were calculated. Results: The economic evaluation revealed that the use of SP-POCUS allowed the hospital to generate €355 net savings per patient, mainly from avoided hospitalizations, fewer hospital days and hours of operating room. Extrapolating these results to a wider scenario, in a similar setting they could have represented a potential annual savings of more than €1.1 million for the Regional healthcare system in Lombardy, and more than €5.7 millions for the whole NHS in Italy. Conclusions: We provided evidence that SP-POCUS may generate important costs savings for health care providers, as it represents the most cost-effective initial diagnostic procedure compared to standard alternatives. The wide applicability of SP-POCUS could be obtained at rather negligible costs for investment in staff training.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/334521</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://n2t.net/ark:/12658/srd1334521</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/334521/files/03_MESAOA_129_24 Pezzottaetal.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3280/mesa2024-129oa18722</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1334521</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Mecosan. - 2024, vol. 129, no. Febbraio</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">SP-POCUS</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Bedside US</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Routinely use</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Surgeon</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Cost-benefit analysis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Costs</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Benefits</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Hospital stay</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">Hospitalization</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns10="xml" ns10:lang="en">Surgery</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns11="xml" ns11:lang="en">Cost and benefit analysis of Surgenon-performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound (SP-POCUS) supporting decision making in a General Surgery Department</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
