<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Noack, Julia</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bernasconi, Riccardo</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Molinari, Maurizio</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014-08-19</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">An essential step during the intracellular life cycle of many positive-strand RNA viruses  is the rearrangement of host cell membranes to generate membrane-bound replication  platforms. For example, Nidovirales and Flaviviridae subvert the membrane of the  endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for their replication. However, the absence of conventional  ER and secretory pathway markers in virus-induced ER-derived membranes has for a  long time hampered a thorough understanding of their biogenesis. Recent reports  highlight the analogies between mouse hepatitis virus-, equine arteritis virus-, and  Japanese encephalitis virus-induced replication platforms and ER-associated  degradation (ERAD) tuning vesicles (or EDEMosomes) that display nonlipidated LC3 at  their cytosolic face and segregate the ERAD factors EDEM1, OS-9, and SEL1L from  the ER lumen. In this Gem, we briefly summarize the current knowledge on ERAD  tuning pathways and how they might be hijacked for viral genome replication. As ERAD  tuning components, such as SEL1L and nonlipidated LC3, appear to contribute to viral  infection, these cellular pathways represent novel candidate drug targets to combat  positive-strand RNA viruses.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/319038</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://localhost:5000/ark:/12658/srd1319038</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/319038/files/Noack_JV_2014.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1128/JVI.00801-14</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1319038</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Journal of virology. - 2014, vol. 88, no. 18, p. 10272-10275</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/61</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">How viruses hijack the ERAD tuning machinery</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
