<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Smith, Peter C.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Anell, Anders</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Busse, Reinhard</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Crivelli, Luca</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Healy, Judith</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lindahl, Anne Karin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Westert, Gert</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kene, Tobechukwu</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">This paper explores leadership and governance arrangements in seven developed health  systems: Australia, England, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and  Switzerland. It presents a cybernetic model of leadership and governance comprising three  fundamental functions: priority setting, performance monitoring and accountability  arrangements. The paper uses a structured survey to examine critically current  arrangements in the seven countries. Approaches to leadership and governance vary  substantially, and have to date been developed piecemeal and somewhat arbitrarily.  Although there seems to be reasonable consensus on broad goals of the health system  there is variation in approaches to setting priorities. Cost-effectiveness analysis is in  widespread use as a basis for operational priority setting, but rarely plays a central role.  Performance monitoring may be the domain where there is most convergence of thinking,  although countries are at different stages of development. The third domain of  accountability is where the greatest variation occurs, and where there is greatest  uncertainty about the optimal approach. We conclude that a judicious mix of accountability  mechanisms is likely to be appropriate in most settings, including market mechanisms,  electoral processes, direct financial incentives, and professional oversight and control. The  mechanisms should be aligned with the priority setting and monitoring processes.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://n2t.net/ark:/12658/srd1318584</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/318584</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/318584/files/crivelli_HP_2012.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.12.009</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1318584</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Health policy. - Elsevier. - 2012, vol. 106, no. 1, p. 37-49</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Leadership</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">governance</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">health systems</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">accountability</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/61</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Leadership and governance in seven developed health systems</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
