<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Arcidiacono, Francesco</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bova, Antonio</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">This study aims to analyze how family members engage themselves in resolving differences of opinion during everyday interactions. In particular, we focus on  the argumentative strategies used by parents during dinner conversations at home with their children. Within a data corpus based on video-recordings of family  dinnertime interactions, two different excerpts of argumentative discussions among parents and children are presented and qualitatively analyzed. Our  analytical approach includes the model of Critical Discussion as the general framework to investigate the family's strategies for conflict management and  resolution in different cultures. The results show two specific argumentative strategies adopted by parents with their children: the use of ironic comments, and  the admonition of the parent's authority. Besides, differences in the argumentative style between Italian and Swiss families are highlighted.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://localhost:5000/ark:/12658/srd1318370</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/318370</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/318370/files/Bova_PSBS_2011.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.269</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1318370</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Procedia: social and behavioral sciences. - Elsevier. - 2011, vol. 30, p. 1385–1389</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Family</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">argumentation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">discursive interaction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">critical discussion</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">parent-child conversation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">case studies</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/65</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Argumentative strategies for conflict management and resolution in Italian and Swiss families</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
