<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Snehota, Ivan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>La Rocca, Antonella</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011-05-02</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">The existence of continuous buyer-seller relationships in business-to- business markets has been evidenced in numerous empirical studies  and more recently acknowledged in marketing in general. Research  shows that the critical process in the development of business  relationships is interaction (Håkansson et al., 2009). This study deals  with the interactive behaviours of actors and focuses on how actors  interpret each other’s identities. We review three fields of research that  offer impulses for re-examining the role of actors from interaction  perspective: relationship studies in business marketing - Industrial  Marketing and Purchasing (IMP) in particular; the social interactionism in  sociology (e.g. Goffman, 1959); and the sense-making stream in social  psychology (e.g. Weick, 1995). We start examining how existence of  relationships impacts the concept of markets and leads to the concept of  business networks; proceed reviewing the literature on analysis of  relationships and behaviour of actors in interaction, and finally formulate  two propositions that drive the empirical study and regard relational  specificity and emergent nature of actor identities in interaction. Data  has been collected on 32 customer relationships of an industrial  company through 128 interviews before and after a meeting with  customer and supplier representatives regarding perceptions of the  counterpart’s performance quality and organization personality. Our  findings support for two broad hypotheses: 1) identity attributed to the  counterpart changes from interaction to interaction and is continuously  emergent; 2) identity of a business is relationship specific and, as a  consequence, every business tends to have multiple identities. We  conclude discussing the consequences of our findings for  conceptualizing actors from interaction perspective and the implications  for further research and practice.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/318274</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://localhost:5000/ark:/12658/srd1318274</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/318274/files/2011COM002.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:rero-006-109981</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1318274</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Identity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">interaction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">business relationship</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">actors</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Interaction and actors‘ identities in business relationships</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
