<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Masiero, Lorenzo</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Maggi, Rico</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009-09-16</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Infrastructure vulnerability is a topic of rising interest in the scientific  literature for both the general increase of unexpected events and the  strategic importance of certain links. Protective investments are  extremely costly and risks are distributed in space and time which  poses important decision problems to the public sector decision makers.  In an economic prospective, the evaluation of infrastructure vulnerability  is oriented on the estimation of direct and indirect costs of hazards.  Although the estimation of direct costs is straightforward, the evaluation  of indirect cost involves factors non-directly observable making the  approximation a difficult issue. This paper provides an estimate of the  indirect costs caused by a two weeks closure of the north-south  Gotthard road corridor, one of the most important infrastructure links in  Europe, and implements a cost-benefit analysis tool that allows the  evaluation of measures ensuring a full protection along the corridor. The  identification of the indirect cost relies on the generalized cost  estimation, which parameters come from two stated preference  experiments, the first based on actual condition whereas the second  assumes a road closure. The procedure outlined in this paper proposes  a methodology aimed to identify and quantify the economic vulnerability  associated with a road transport infrastructure and, to evaluate the  economic and social efficiency of a vulnerability reduction by the  consideration of protective measures.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://n2t.net/ark:/12658/srd1318181</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/318181</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/318181/files/wp1003.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1318181</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Infrastructure vulnerability</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Choice experiment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Cost-benefit analysis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Freight transport</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Estimation of indirect cost and evaluation of protective measures for infrastructure vulnerability : a case study on the transalpine transport corridor</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_816b</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
