<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Lomi, Alessandro</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Larsen, Erik Raimer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Pagani, Giuseppe</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2008-02-25</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">"Why are there so many kinds of organizations?" (Hannan and Freeman,  1977: 936). As Astley (1985) suggests, "[t]his question focuses inquiry  on organizational diversity, the differentiation of organizations into  varying population types" (p. 224). Out of the different literature  streams, which have addressed the topic of organizational diversity, an  effective explanation of the dynamics related to this organizational  phenomenon has been provided by Resource Partitioning theory (Carroll,  1985), which has attempted to explain the coexistence of patterns of  concentration and specialization within the same industrial setting.  Despite the extensive empirical evidence supporting Resource  Partitioning theory (see Carroll, Dobrev and Swaminathan, 2002 for a  review), an effective and thorough explanation and specification of the  causal mechanisms underlying the operation of this industrial  segregating process has not yet been effectively advanced. (Carroll  and Hannan, 2000; Carroll, et al., 2002). This theory leaves apart many  important questions about the emergence, the evolution and the  persistence of instances of organizational diversity in given industries.  In general, the theory does not specify what a generalist and a  specialist organization are. To answer this question, this dissertation  aims at complementing industry-level explanations of organizational  diversity put forward by resource partitioning theory with an analysis of  the internal processes featuring generalist and specialist firms'  practices, within the industrial setting of Professional Service Firms  (PSFs). This particular context was chosen because PSFs frequently  operate in a competitive environment in which "[t]he large, multinational  accounting firms coexist with very small, local auditing firms, and both  may be highly profitable simultaneously" (Løwendahl, 2005: 127). To  attain this task, I rely upon the development of a dynamic simulation  model.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://localhost:5000/ark:/12658/srd1318171</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/318171</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/318171/files/2008ECO003.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:rero-006-108182</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1318171</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Resource partitioning theory</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Professional service firms</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">System 
dynamics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Organizational antecedents of population-level organizational diversity : Exploring the micro-foundations of resource partitioning theory : a simulation approach</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
