<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Banfi, Silvia</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Farsi, Mehdi</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Filippini, Massimo</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>italiana, Svizzera</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Jakob, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">This paper uses a choice experiment to evaluate the consumers'  willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in Switzerland's  residential buildings. These measures include air renewal (ventilation)  systems and insulation of windows and facades. Two groups of  respondents consisting respectively of 163 apartment tenants and 142  house owners were asked to choose between their housing status quo  and each one of the several hypothetical situations with different  attributes and prices. The estimation method is based on a fixed effects  logit model. The results suggest that the benefits of the energysaving  attributes are significantly valued by the consumers. These benefits  include both individual energy savings and environmental benefits as  well as comfort benefits namely, thermal comfort, air quality and noise  protection.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://localhost:5000/ark:/12658/srd1318051</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/global/documents/318051</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://susi.usi.ch/documents/318051/files/filippini_EE_2007_2.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.06.001</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/12658/srd1318051</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Energy Economics. - Elsevier BV. - 2008, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 503-516</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Energy efficiency</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">energy saving</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">choice experiment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">conjoint analysis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">discrete choice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">housing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">fixed effect logit</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
